To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 24 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • May 28, 2014
‘Godzilla’ has elements from old films, but is fresh
by Dennis Seuling
The first Godzilla movie was made in 1954 in Japan
and, with the addition of Raymond Burr, released in the
United States in 1956. “Godzilla” was a success, though he
was by no means the first cinematic dinosaur to prey on the
modern world. Dinosaurs running amok date back to the
silent picture “The Lost World” (1925) and more famously
“King Kong” (1933). Just one year before Godzilla dev-
astated Tokyo, “The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms” took a
heavy toll on Manhattan and Coney Island.
The original Godzilla was released from its prehistoric
burial ground by nuclear tests and became a metaphor for
the potential, catastrophic consequences of man tampering
with the balance of nature.
In this new version, a prologue introduces viewers to
Joe Brody (Bryan Cranston, “Breaking Bad”), a nuclear
engineer who witnesses the death of his wife as a sudden,
powerful earthquake destroys a nuclear power plant. The
sequence is well staged and brings to mind the recent Fuku-
shima disaster.
Years later, Joe’s son (Aaron Taylor-Johnson) finds him-
self in the midst of more unexplained rumblings, this time
in San Francisco. Dr. Ichiro Serizawa (Ken Watanabe) is a
scientist whose primary job is to look somber as things go
from bad to worse and Godzilla is again unleashed on the
populace. Director Gareth Edwards (“Monsters”) keeps viewers
A huge, dormant creature reawakens and devastates San Francisco in ‘Godzilla.’
in suspense by revealing the title character only in brief
glimpses at first as humans scurry hither and yon trying
their best to ready themselves for what will become a tragedy
of enormous proportions. The design of the creature is an
improvement over the numerous previous Godzillas, which
employed a man in a dinosaur suit. With computer artistry,
the scaly creature now lumbers convincingly through San
Francisco, squashing buildings, vehicles, people, and doing
a number on the Golden Gate Bridge. Every so often, he
lets out a roar just to announce his dominance.
Much of the story relies on formula plots for ‘50s mon-
ster movies. The military figures prominently in tracking
and readying defenses against the creature, characters are
shallow and generic, and humans scramble to escape the
marauding, reawakened dinosaur. Godzilla even battles a
couple of insect-like creatures reminiscent of H.R. Giger’s
nightmare monster from “Alien.” Far too many “lucky
coincidences” occur in which key characters are saved
from annihilation, rescued from precarious situations, or
miraculously avoid the lethal tread of the gigantic lizard.
There has always been an underlying message in the
Godzilla movies. The message is emphasized more sharply
here and resonates significantly because of increased con-
cern about climate change, but the film puts entertainment
first and avoids being preachy. Of course, with such a huge
star, literally, in Godzilla, the filmmakers have left the door
open to sequels. Never kill the Golden Cow, especially if he
is as tall as a skyscraper and generates mountains of box
office dollars. With all its shortcomings, “Godzilla” is the
ultimate popcorn movie, a perfect divertissement for the
summer months.
Rated PG-13 for fairly tame violence, “Godzilla” pays
homage to the original while greatly improving the mon-
ster’s appearance. Rather than completely reinventing the
creature, the filmmakers have taken elements from the old
films and distilled them into something that feels newly
created rather than recycled with a bigger budget and
improved effects.