To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 24 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • May 21, 2014
‘Neighbors’ suffers from departures from script
Seth Rogen and Zac Efron star in ‘Neighbors.’
by Dennis Seuling
Mac (Seth Rogen) and Kelly (Rose
Byrne) Radner live with their new baby in
a lovely home on a quiet street. They are
happy and enjoy their time together. Their
contentment is not going to last long. One
day, a fraternity from the local college
moves in next door, and the couple fears this
can only mean wild parties, heavy drinking,
and constant disturbances. In order to avoid
this, Mac and Kelly pay a visit to their new
neighbors. Invited to party, Mac and Kelly
indulge until they eventually depart with a
mild request to keep the noise down. They
are assured by fraternity officers Teddy
(Zac Efron) and Pete (Dave Franco) that the
fraternity house will be the ideal neighbor.
Late one night, during an especially
loud fraternity party, the Radners call the
police in desperation. Teddy and his frater-
nity brothers declare war on the Radners,
making their life as miserable as possible.
Not to be outdone, Mac and Kelly recip-
rocate by causing a flood in the fraternity
house’s basement and issuing a formal com-
Advertise your Restaurant for
Father’s Day in The Villadom TIMES
plaint to the college dean (Lisa Kudrow).
The rest of the film is about outdoing each
other with mean-spirited “pranks” to force
each other to move out.
Rogen has a goofy kind of charm that
has worked for him in previous films,
but here he is overbearing, grating, and
— worst of all — unfunny. To make up
for lack of genuine humor in the script, he
mugs endlessly and behaves as if bellowing
and slapstick are enough to create a comic
performance. The film’s R rating allows
him to use strong language and involve
himself in sexual scenes, but they add noth-
ing to the movie.
Byrne looks like she is treading water
in this loud, offensive picture. There is no
chemistry between her and Rogen. They are
playing a happily married couple, but they
are unconvincing. Byrne never attempts
an American accent, so a throwaway line
by Rogen establishes Kelly’s Australian
origins. An actor should be able to adopt
accents. It is part of the job. If Meryl Streep
and Nicole Kidman can do it, Byrne should,
too. Efron’s performance is the most amus-
ing in an otherwise dull picture. His Teddy
is a self-parody of his hunky, dreamboat
image and he embraces it completely.
Unlike the others in the cast, he appears
more grounded, less unsure of what to do
next. That is because he adheres to the
script, unlike everyone else in the cast,
who indulge in improvisation to little
comic effect. Teddy knows how to get by
on his looks and charm, but finds himself
up against people who are not buying his
smiles, good looks, and gentle talk.
Franco stands out as the frat’s vice
president and conscience. Though his Pete
possesses an X-rated talent, he recognizes
that a college fraternity and nightly par-
ties will soon give way to concerns about
what he will do after graduation. Franco’s
enthusiasm is infectious, and it is hard to be
immune to his mile-wide smile and spar-
kling personality.
“Neighbors” is as disorganized and
wildly irreverent as the parties thrown by
the fraternity from hell in the movie. Its
over-reliance on improvisation takes its
toll early on with unfunny dialogue, lame
repartee, and terrible editing. When the
viewer is all too aware of improvisation,
the technique falls flat. To complicate mat-
ters, the soundtrack is so loud that it would
be more suitable for a Michael Bay action
flick than a comedy. The Radners may be
driven crazy by the noise from their neigh-
bors, but does the audience have to endure
that onslaught, too?
Rated R for nudity, sexual situations,
alcohol and drug abuse, and strong lan-
guage, “Neighbors” tries very hard to be a
rollicking exercise in untethered hedonism.
It is a good example of what happens when
a director does not have a firm handle on
performances and allows actors to veer
from the written word.