To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 18 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • February 5, 2014
Catching the catcher
by leaving out Cather
PBS recently celebrated the excellent “American Mas-
ters” series by broadcasting an extended version of “Salin-
ger” by Shane Salerno and David Shields.
The “American Masters” show attempted to catch the
catcher: Holden Caulfield of “The Catcher in the Rye.”
Any book that sells 65 million copies, and purportedly
inspired the murder of John Lennon, is worth some serious
study. Shane Salerno spent 10 years and $2 million of his
own money on the project and he discovered some things
no one else had substantiated before. I think he caught the
catcher better than anyone -- but he left out Cather.
In 1905, McClure’s magazine published “Paul’s Case:
A Study in Temperament” by Willa Cather, the turn-of-
the-century poet laureate of maladjustment. Paul is the
would-be snobbish son of a lower-middle-class family
from Pittsburgh whose father adopts the American suc-
cess story as the family anthem. Paul is often in trouble
at school, not in a violent way, but because he refuses to
fit in and cannot understand the people who want to. He
dresses flamboyantly and very much outside the norm
with a flower on his lapel. Paul cops some money, takes off
for New York City, and fills his room with flowers. Cather
offers some hints about Paul. “He burnt like a faggot in
a tempest.” “He fell in with a wild San Francisco boy, a
freshman at Yale.” “They had started out in the confiding
warmth of a champagne friendship, but their parting in the
elevator was singularly cool.”
Paul runs out of money, heads back to Pittsburgh is dis-
grace, thinks it over, and walks into a moving locomotive.
All things considered, American kids are much better
off with Caulfield as a role model. However, the Cather
story contains so many aspects of the scared-but-straight
Caulfield’s adventures in “The Catcher in the Rye” that I
think a conjecture that it served as a subconscious inspira-
tion is not irresponsible. Cather’s story never turned up in
the PBS “Salinger.”
Salerno notes that Salinger volunteered for World War
II, was rejected, and then volunteered again successfully.
Wikipedia says he was drafted. There is no shame in that.
Most of the other U.S. soldiers were also drafted.
Salinger’s first combat experience was the D-Day
landing in Normandy on June 6, 1944. The documentary
shows Americans landing on Omaha Beach, which was a
slaughter that killed or wounded 2,500 Americans, some
of whom died screaming for their buddies to use them
as sandbags because they had been mortally wounded or
hated the idea of going home without eyes or legs. The
Omaha landing was a heroic tragedy and a near-disaster.
The German shore fortifications had proved impervious
to naval gunfire, the U.S. amphibious tanks sank at sea,
and 500 second-string German infantry inflicted horrific
casualties on a landing force of 30,000 U.S. troops. Then
the Germans ran out of ammunition and retreated inland.
Salinger landed on Utah Beach with the Fourth Infan-
try Division, a very tough outfit. The Utah Beach defenses
were manned by Russian “volunteers” who had signed up
with the Wehrmacht rather than starve in prison camps.
These hapless men overpowered and sometimes killed
their German officers and came out of the bunkers with
their hands up shouting “Me Polski! Me shoot high!” They
surmised that Americans would be more merciful to Poles
than Russians. (Russian collaboration with the Nazi gov-
ernment was massive. Polish collaboration was zero.)
The 23,000 Americans suffered one percent losses at
Utah Beach, mostly from long-range artillery and land-
mines. Why show carnage shots of Omaha?
Salinger had a rough war after that, though he served
primarily in military intelligence rather than combat
infantry. He spoke German and French, and his role was
more combat-support than combat, though his life was
absolutely at risk. He was horrified by the discovery of
the Nazi death camp at Dachau and retained an instinc-
tive, angry, and justified hatred of anti-Semitism for the
rest of his life. Conversely, the PBS documentary reveals
that he had a first (previously undiscovered) marriage to a
German woman whom he brought back to New York. She
was described as “a member of the Nazi party,” which can
mean just about anything. This is treated as completely
inexplicable. Salinger claimed a psychic link with his German war
bride. His family, who still supported him, hated her on
principle. A quick, quiet divorce soon followed. The docu-
mentary reveals this for the first time.
What the documentary does not dwell on is that Salin-
ger had a strong affinity for Christianity in all his books.
Caulfield never makes fun of Jesus, and he likes nuns,
though he is not Catholic. He was also interested in Bud-
dhism, and the documentary links him to Hinduism.
Salinger reportedly carried six chapters of “The
Catcher in the Rye” in his pack “as a talisman.” Oddly
enough, “Catcher,” published in 1951, is so clearly set in
the prosperous and self-confident aftermath of the war
that the chapters must have been revised. The name, but
not the character, of Caulfield reportedly turns up in an
unpublished story Salinger sent back from Europe during
the war. In 1947, another Holden--Caulfield constellation
appeared as William Holden starred opposite Joan Caul-
field in “Dear Ruth,” a romantic comedy about teenage
bamboozlement. Is this coincidence?
In 1950, Holden starred opposite Gloria Swanson in
“Sunset Boulevard,” which features a young screenwriter
who hates Hollywood, like B.D. in “Catcher.” The Holden
character in “Sunset Boulevard” is three months behind
in his rent. Caulfield has been kicked out of three prep
schools. The film contains an expensive formal funeral for
a chimpanzee. Caulfield mocks funeral directors -- a char-
acter called Rudy, and says many things are “phony.” The
Holden film character is almost redeemed by an innocent
younger woman -- Caulfield’s sister? Then he is destroyed
by a creepy woman twice his age, just as Caulfield finally
flakes out after a come-on from an apparently gay middle-
aged former instructor.
The previous, unauthorized biography of Salinger
reported that he ran around like crazy asking various
women to marry himself just before “Catcher” came out.
Then he started out on a career as a recluse as far as the
New York literary scene was concerned. Why?
The PBS documentary broke a lot of new ground,
interviewed former lovers or close friends of Salinger,
and revealed him as a man who was fascinated by much
younger women but responsibly refused to kiss a 14-year-
old (she says) or to sleep with an 18-year-old virgin as a
matter of principal (she says.)
The film also reveals how Salinger’s reclusive lifestyle
broke up his second marriage and led him to split with his
live-in lover Joyce Maynard when she wanted kids and he
had two and wanted no more.
In the end, the program included a great many things
about Salinger’s personal life that most people probably
did not need to know. I really felt that his privacy had been
violated. He was a good soldier, a very good writer, and
with allowances for his rampant eccentricities, a good man
who urged people to live decent lives.
I wrote him a letter about Cather and the two movies
some years before he died in 2010, and he never answered,
but I promised that whether he answered or not, I would
not go public during his lifetime. I kept my word. Salinger
had a very rough war, behaved honorably in an eccentric
way, and opposed racial, religious, and economic prejudice
all his life. He deserves respect.
Letters to the Editor
Recycling information appreciated
Dear Editor:
As a member of the Franklin Lakes Green Team, and
therefore someone involved with the environmental com-
mission, recycling is of course a priority. Not only does
recycling affect and improve the environment and our lives,
but it also makes financial sense. An increase in recycling
and decrease in items being placed into the stream of gar-
bage would save many thousands of dollars for Franklin
Lakes. I would like to thank the Borough of Franklin Lakes
for its efforts to increase recycling in town and for dis-
tributing the very thorough and informative mailing that
included the 2014 garbage and recycling information. The
mailing is instructive and easy to follow, and all of us on
the Green Team and environmental commission hope that
this endeavor on the part of the town’s governing body and
administration will be effective in increasing our recycling
efforts. Larissa Symbouras
Franklin Lakes
Love Fund makes appeal
Dear Editor:
Valentine’s Day is a time of year when we make a point
of showing our love and commitment to those we hold dear.
It’s also the time when the Midland Park Children’s Love
Fund, Inc. traditionally kicks off its annual town-wide
campaign. We are asking those who are financially secure
to consider helping the children of our Midland Park neigh-
bors whose families may be going through a difficult time.
A mailer is being sent to your home describing what the
Children’s Love Fund is all about. Please take a moment to
read it over to get an idea of the kind of help that the Love
Fund provides.
The Children’s Love Fund depends on your continued
support each year. The Midland Park community has a long
tradition of giving generously to our organization, and we
are hopeful that this will continue in 2014. As our economy
continues to be uncertain, many families are still in need of
some financial assistance to make ends meet. Your gener-
osity means more than ever to families in our community
coping with personal and financial emergencies.
Any contribution that you make is an act of LOVE, and
is greatly appreciated. Your donation goes directly toward
helping families right here in our Midland Park commu-
nity. Please consider making a donation to the Midland
Park Children’s Love Fund, Inc., P.O. Box 327, Midland
Park, NJ 07432.
Noreen Desbiens
Midland Park