To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 14 THE VILLADOM TIMES IV • August 28, 2013
Revulsion from revisionism?
A colleague recently sent me a quote that I found abso-
lutely hilarious.
“It is wiser, I believe, to arrive at theory by way of
evidence rather than the other way around, like so many
revisionists today. It is more rewarding, in any case, to
assemble the facts first and, in the process of arranging
them in narrative form, to discover a theory of a histori-
cal generalization emerging of its own accord.” -- Barbara
Tuchman. Let us take Tuchman at her word and look at her back-
ground and at some of what she wrote, notably the two
books that won her Pulitzer Prizes in 1963 and 1971. Let us
arrive at a generalization and a theory.
Tuchman’s grandfather was Henry Morgenthau Sr., a
brilliant attorney and real estate investor and U.S. Ambas-
sador to the Ottoman Empire. During the Turkish outrages
against the Armenian population, Morgenthau denounced
the Turks and raised millions of dollars for the relief of the
Armenians. Morgenthau also wrote a book in which he
tried to blame the Kaiser’s Germans as the instigators of
the Armenian outrages.
I know people who lost relatives in the Turkish outrages
and none of them blamed the Germans. Some of them cred-
ited German missionaries for rescuing Armenian women
and children. I know of no Armenian historian who cites
the Kaiser’s Germans as instigators.
Tuchman’s father, Maurice Wertheim, was the owner of
The Nation, for many years the voice of the American far
left. The late Susan Sontag was a brilliant woman who told
the truth as she saw it. Sontag said after the collapse of the
Soviet Union that you could have obtained a better under-
standing of brutal Soviet Russian repression by reading
the middle-class, small-town Saturday Evening Post and
Reader’s Digest rather than The Nation. I am impressed
by Sontag’s honesty and courage. Favorable mention of
Reader’s Digest on the left used to be grounds for verbal
lynching and probably could have cost you your tenure at
Columbia or NYU.
Tuchman’s uncle was Henry Morgenthau Jr., close friend
of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the key stooge for Harry
Dexter White, Stalin’s top man in the Roosevelt adminis-
tration. Morgenthau Jr. was so dense that he probably did
not know White was a Soviet agent, but he was a talking
head for a man lauded after his death as a hero of commu-
nism by Vitalii Pavlov, White’s key contact and a retired
lieutenant general of the KGB. Under White’s manipula-
tion, Morgenthau Jr. was the first federal official to suggest
Japanese-American relocation, described by the American
Civil Liberties Union as the worst abuse of Constitutional
rights since the end of slavery.
White was subsequently denounced by the FBI as a
Soviet agent to President Harry Truman shortly after FDR
died. A statement by FBI Special Agent Ladd made it offi-
cial in 1950. Pavlov confirmed it in 1996 in a memoir. The
Nation still denies White’s guilt as a vile calumny against
a brave little liberal.
After her graduation from Radcliffe, Tuchman worked
at the Institute of Pacific Relations, where her boss was
Owen Lattimore. Lattimore was denounced by Senator
Joseph McCarthy and others as “the man who lost China.”
There is a certain arrogance in the idea that China was ever
ours to lose.
White recommended Lattimore to FDR as the man to
send to China to advise Chiang Kai-shek in the war against
Japan. Before the Anti-Comintern Pact -- later known as
The Axis -- Chiang had been sustained by German mili-
tary advisors who helped him fight the Chinese commu-
nists to a standstill. Hitler pulled them out. Before they left,
the Germans told Chiang to write off North China because
the food base was inadequate and the Japanese lacked the
manpower to control the land. The Germans told Chiang to
fight the Japanese from the south where food was ample.
Lattimore then nominated General Joseph Stilwell as Chi-
ang’s military adviser and told them to keep fighting in the
north. In the interest of being objective, Lattimore and Stil-
well both spoke Chinese and Stilwell -- unlike Lattimore
-- was a patriotic American. In the interest of being honest,
Chiang and Stilwell, separately and together, bungled the
war against Japan on the Asian continent so badly that the
Japanese were still winning when the bombs began to fall
on Japan.
Xue Yue, the one Nationalist Chinese general who was
ready for a hero’s death, asked the Americans to air-drop
supplies so he would have enough ammunition for a last
stand in Hengyang. Nobody was interested. Stilwell pre-
ferred to fight a grudge match against the Japanese who
had kicked him out of Burma two years before.
Stilwell, now in failing health, was effectively sacked,
and was replaced by U.S. General Albert Wedermeyer.
Jonathan Fenby, an English newsman who covered China
and spoke Chinese, said Stilwell was a good man but not a
good general.
The new American general presented the Chinese
Nationalists with his own plan to defend China. Madame
Chiang Kai-shek looked over the Wedermeyer Plan and
said, “This is just what the Germans told us to do.”
Meanwhile, White cut off Chiang’s credit and ruined
what was left of the Chinese economy. Once the Japanese
were defeated by U.S. submarines and air raids, efforts to
ward off the Chinese communists were soft-peddled. Lat-
timore also recommended that the U.S. write off Korea,
a country where most people were pro-American and
anti-communist. He stripped post-war occupied Japan of
machine tools and aluminum so that when both the Chi-
nese Nationalists and the Americans requested Japanese
rearmament during the Korean War, there was no indus-
trial base to make rearmament possible. Then Lattimore
retired to Mongolia, which may be the only country in the
world where he is still commemorated. The communists
got to control most of the Eurasian continent.
Tuchman does not seem to have considered Lattimore’s
exploits as in any way suspicious. She seems to have seen
Japan’s war effort as a decision to get out of bed in the
morning, without mentioning that Japan was the leading
anti-communist power in Asia and that Theodore Roosevelt
had agreed to let the Japanese have Korea and Manchuria
in return for helping Britain and America keep the Rus-
sians out of China and India. In “Stilwell and the American
Experience in China,” Pulitzer Prize for 1971, the Japanese
had come to China purely to rape and murder, the Chinese
Nationalists were all corrupt and expendable dunces, Stil-
well was the on-stage hero, and the Chinese communists
were obviously the off-stage heroes, though the Chinese
communists murdered far more people than Chiang and
many more than Hirohito.
In “The Zimmermann Telegram,” Tuchman exposed a
flamboyant German-Japanese plot to take over Mexico.
In “The Guns of August,” Pulitzer Prize for 1963,
German atrocities in Belgium -- some of them actually
happened -- are recounted, but Russian atrocities in East
Prussia are treated as a good joke on the German residents.
With “The Guns of August” stuck in school curricula like a
lump of cholesterol in the carotid artery, students are insu-
lated from revisionists like my friend Thomas Fleming.
Fleming’s book, “The Illusion of Victory,” deals with the
origins of the war far more objectively than Tuchman’s pre-
dictable disclosure that the Germans were the bad guys and
the other nations were dupes. No serious historian believes
that any more.
Terence Zuber, a former U.S. infantry and counter-
intelligence officer, makes a strong case in “Inventing the
Schlieffen Plan” for Russian military preparations as the
catalytic threat for German militarism of the Kaiser’s era,
and some modern Russian revisionists agree with him.
Patrick Buchanan is obviously out of the question, even
though he felt the world would have been a better place
if Hitler and Stalin had slugged it out without American
intervention. To people outside the far left, Russia was the
big threat after the fall of the Kaiser.
Of his former friend Kaiser Wilhelm II, Winston
Churchill, who like Wilhelm was a would-be athlete par-
tially crippled in one arm, said, “It was not his fault; it was
his fate.” Of the world after the World War I Armistice and
the Bolshevik Revolution, Churchill said, “After conquer-
ing all the Huns, the tigers of the world, I will not be beaten
by the baboons.”
Churchill wanted the world to wake up to the threat
of Bolshevism, which also helped bring Hitler to power,
though you are not supposed to say that in polite company.
Tuchman wanted the world to sleep on -- and after the fall
of the Soviet Union to forget the roles some of her rela-
tives and family friends played in the attempted betrayal of
America and the free world to the Soviets.
In 1985, while she was still alive, Saturday Review, not
exactly a fascist tabloid, named Tuchman “One of the Most
Overrated People in American Arts and Letters.” This was
before Pavlov confirmed that White was a Soviet agent and
probably before anybody knew that Morgenthau Jr. had
instigated Japanese-American relocation. White’s back-
stabbing of Chiang and Lattimore’s patent treason were
widely understood from McCarthy’s time, but revisionists
who dared to look behind statist propaganda were discour-
aged from saying so.
Tuchman was a Marxist apologist. Churchill fought
Hitler and opposed Stalin. He also wrote better.
Background checks urged
(continued from page 10)
Senator Robert Gordon and Assemblyman Tim Eustace
stopped by to talk with residents about what is happening
on the state level.
“We are not going give up when it comes to passing
common-sense legislation that will keep guns from crimi-
nals, terrorists, and the dangerously mentally ill,” said
House Gun Violence Prevention Task Force Chairman
Mike Thompson. He added, “The bipartisan background
check bill I’ve introduced respects the Second Amendment
and will save lives. It deserves a vote.”
Much like Mothers Against Drunk Driving was created
to change laws regarding drunk driving, Moms Demand
Action for Gun Sense in America (www.momsdemandac-
tion.org) was created to build support for common sense
gun legislation. The nonpartisan grassroots movement of
American mothers is demanding new and stronger solutions
to lax gun laws and loopholes that jeopardize the safety of
children and families. In just seven months, the organiza-
tion has more than 100,000 members with chapters in 40
states across the country.
Pictured at right: Robyn Platis of MDA and future activists
helped organize this event.