To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 14 THE VILLADOM TIMES II • July 31, 2013
When America’s history
becomes popular history
I recently saw the Ken Burns PBS special, “Lewis
& Clark: The Corps of Discovery,” which was splen-
didly filmed. The narrative, written by Dayton Duncan,
was largely based on the book “Undaunted Courage” by
Stephen E. Ambrose. My envy of the amount of money
Ambrose made writing popular history has to be consid-
ered a factor in the following analysis. Other historians
who teach for their subsistence, however, tend to agree
with me.
Ambrose, who died in 2002, was perhaps the most pop-
ular historian in the United States during the last decades
of his life. That title carries a lot of baggage. While some
people are interested in being told what really happened,
most people want to be told that what they want to have
happened actually happened.
Americans are no more culpable than other people. For
example, the mainland Chinese desperately want the Japa-
nese army to have killed 300,000 people after the fall of
Nanking in 1937. The fact that the population of the city
was about 200,000 at the time and that most of the people
survived, some eating Japanese-issued rations, doesn’t
shake the Chinese from that number.
Some Japanese want there to have been no atrocities.
They obfuscate. They also say that one key witness, John
Rabe, was a Nazi and another, Harold Timperley, was a
paid Chinese propagandist.
The Germans want Nanking to have been a second
Holocaust, but not by them. They have made six movies
about it featuring good Germans and many Europeans
who saw the aftermath. Their final numbers justify a
death count of about 26,000, most of them Chinese sol-
diers killed in battle or shot when they were caught out of
uniform. Burial squads report that only 1.2 percent of the
26,000 people they buried were women or children. Bad as
that is, comparison of Nanking to the premeditated mass
murders in far greater numbers by Mao, Stalin, or Hitler
is in bad taste. But it’s a great justification for a U.S. mass
area bombing that killed 800,000 Japanese civilians. It’s
also a great way for the modern Chinese to stir up opposi-
tion to modern Japanese rearmament, which is supported
by all Asians except the Chinese because the rest of Asia
thinks we are about to flop on them or sell them out.
Speaking of Hitler, does anybody remember the “Hitler
Diaries”? These were supposedly rescued from a World
War II plane crash in a cow pasture and preserved by a
covert Hitler admirer until, in 1983, he brokered them to
a couple other covert admirers, who sold them to “Der
Stern,” a West German news magazine.
The renowned British historian Hugh Trevor-Roper
said, “I am now satisfied that the documents are authen-
tic. . . and that the standard accounts of Hitler’s writing
habits, of his personality and even, perhaps, of some public
events, may in consequence have to be revised.”
The West German historian Gerhard Weinberg, a
German Jewish Holocaust fugitive who later returned to
West Germany, said, “On balance, I am inclined to con-
sider the material authentic.” But the 60 books of the diary
offered the world a kinder, gentler Hitler who was never
told about the Holocaust. This flunked the sanity test.
Former West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, who
won the Iron Cross serving in an anti-aircraft battery with
the Wehrmacht, said he thought the diaries were fakes.
Incredibly, it was David Irving -- an Englishman dis-
missed by leftists and liberals as a right-wing nut -- who
said the diaries were forgeries. Irving was, as they say,
“right” in both senses of the word. The pages had been
aged with tea stains and the handwriting was not Hitler’s.
The two crooks who forged the diaries got four years
apiece in prison. Then both retired and did well on their
notoriety. Conversely, I remember reading a French textbook
some 50 years ago that reported: “France won the second
world war with the help of her allies.” The South Korean
textbooks say they could have beaten Japan without our
help. Quite.
America has also seen some wild departures from
peer-reviewed history. The smoking pistol in the Ambrose
version in “Undaunted Courage” is the one that killed
Meriwether Lewis. Ambrose says the leader of the Lewis
and Clark Expedition undoubtedly committed suicide due
to depression brought on by heredity and by ingratitude.
He cites Thomas Jefferson as accepting the suicide and
that, as they say, is that. In fact, the majority of contempo-
rary scholars understand that Lewis was almost certainly
a murder victim. James Dillon, who wrote the best biogra-
phy of Lewis in the 1960s, summed it up. “Was Meriwether
Lewis murdered? Yes. Is there proof of his murder? No.
The Burns version has Lewis (and Clark) in 1804 very
much at odds with the Lakota -- the Sioux as the narra-
tive calls them -- and portrays the tribe as powerful, scary,
arrogant, sometimes obnoxious, and definitely treach-
erous. Francis Parkman, who lived with the Lakota 40
years later described them as powerful and arrogant but
also generous, honest, immensely hospitable, and reliable.
Parkman was not unduly fond of Indians in general but he
rated the “Sioux” as an exceptional people, not the scowl-
ing villains Ambrose and Burns serve up.
The biographer Dillon, who was not quoted in the
documentary, leaves viewers with one fact: In 1811, Lewis
got along so well with the Lakota that, when they were
approached by British agents before the War if 1812, they
remained committed to Lewis and to the United States.
Had the Lakota fought for the British in 1812, the Ameri-
cans would have done about as well as Custer did 50 years
later. Among the people who wanted Lewis dead, the Brit-
ish government deserves at least a nod.
That, however, is conspiracy theory. The more prob-
able criminal suspects include John Pernier, Lewis’s ser-
vant; James Neelly, agent to the Chickasaw Indians; or the
Grinder family, who operated a roadside inn where Lewis
spent his last night – Oct. 10-11, 1811.
Lewis owed Pernier money, and when Lewis was dead,
Pernier helped himself to Lewis’s coat and, quite possibly,
the $120 Lewis was known to have been carrying. Lewis
was found with sixpence in his pocket. Pernier committed
suicide with laudanum a year after Lewis died.
Neelly, a sometime rival, supplied most accounts of
Lewis’s despondency in the days before his death -- and
helped himself to Lewis’ prize rifle and pistols. Neelly
had worked as a subordinate of Lewis, and the Indians he
supervised -- who respected Lewis -- asked for Neelly’s
dismissal, which was granted. One version has Neelly get-
ting Lewis drunk and then deliberately leaving so some-
one else could do the dirty work while he had an alibi.
The Grinders seem to have come into some money
right after Lewis died, and moved soon afterwards. The
Natchez Trace, the road where Lewis died, was a known
haunt of road and river pirates. Significantly, expedition
co-leader Willam Clark, a close friend who named his
son after Lewis, first accepted Lewis as a suicide but later
believed he was murdered.
Vardis Fisher, who authored “Murder or Suicide: The
Strange Death of Meriwether Lewis” in 1962, said almost
nobody since the 19 th century accepted Lewis’ death as sui-
cide. Dillon believed the killer or killers were anonymous
rogues and that the name-brand suspects and the landlady
simply failed to take good care of a friend, employer, or
guest while he was in his cups.
Nobody admits to seeing Lewis shoot himself once in
the abdomen and once in the forehead. Mrs. Grinder heard
the shots, but did not help until Lewis crawled out into
the yard. The forehead and abdomen are odd targets for
suicide, and Lewis had been around guns all his life and
knew something of anatomy. Reports indicate he was also
heavily slashed with a knife or straight razor. There was
no formal autopsy and nobody who was not a suspect ever
saw the body.
Requests for a modern autopsy by James Starrs, a
retired professor at George Washington University have
been approved by Lewis’ collateral relatives -- and rejected
by the National Park Service.
Ambrose mentioned Pernier, but never questioned his
conduct. He also mentioned Neelly as being off looking
for a lost horse when Lewis was killed -- and beyond sus-
picion. The disappearance of Lewis’ personal property
was not mentioned. The possibility of murder was brushed
off with no discussion of the odd facts of the “suicide.” But
besides Lewis -- a real hero for most of his life as Ambrose
says -- the other hero of all of Ambrose’s books is “the
American people” and their great leaders, which is why
his books are so popular.
Ambrose dismissed the allegation that Jefferson kept a
black slave girl as his mistress. DNA has since proven that
Sally Hemings’ children were fathered by Thomas Jeffer-
son or his brother -- and the brother wasn’t around when
the children were conceived.
Ambrose dismissed George Armstrong Custer’s affair
with a captive Cheyenne girl named Monasetah as a rumor.
Read Custer in “My Life on the Plains” or Elizabeth Custer
in “Following the Guidon,” or the account by Monasetah’s
aunt, which is explicit. That rumor also appears to have
been a fact.
These parts of Jefferson’s and Custer’s lives would not
have played well with Ambrose’s perceived Middle Amer-
ican audience. The idea that a great and worthy Ameri-
can like Lewis could have been murdered by “common
man” types -- anonymous thieves, a greedy servant, a
crooked Indian agent, or a frontier couple running a road-
side tavern -- reflects badly on the population as a whole.
Ask a “Sioux” about Indian agents or about stalwart fron-
tier families of the early 19 th century. Those who ask will
get a view of history that is a little different from that of
Ambrose. Area
Hike raises funds for headquarters
This month, Mellonie Sanborn successfully completed a
hike of over 22 miles to benefit the restoration of the New
York/New Jersey Trail Conference’s future headquarters at
the Darlington Schoolhouse in Mahwah.
Sanborn was joined by three other NY/NJ Trail Confer-
ence members and volunteers: Ed DiSalvo from West Mil-
ford and Irene and Gary Auleta from Franklin Lakes. Chris
Norris from Norwood and Trail Conference Development
Director Don Weise supplied water, snacks, and words of
encouragement for two-thirds of the group’s hike.
On July 20, the hikers started out at 7:15 a.m. from Dar-
lington Schoolhouse on Ramapo Valley Road (Route 202)
in Mahwah. Despite temperatures that reached into the 90s,
Sanborn and crew hiked to the Senator Frank Lautenberg
Visitor Center in Sterling Forest State Park in New York in
10.25 hours to complete their through-hike, ending at the
visitor center at 5:30 p.m.
This hike to benefit Darlington Schoolhouse has raised
$1,680 so far. The NY/NJ Trail Conference is still collect-
ing donations toward the benefit hike. To donate to this
cause, visit www.nynjtc.org/donatedarlington. Be sure to
type “Go Mellonie!” in the special instructions box.
The NY/NJ Trail Conference is planning to restore and
expand the schoolhouse, and is currently working to raise
$1 million by Nov. 1 as part of a challenge from Ridgewood
philanthropist David Bolger. If the NY/NJ TC raises the
funds by the November deadline, Bolger has pledged a
$500,000 grant from the Bolger Foundation toward the res-
toration project.
The total cost of the renovation work has been estimated
at $2.5 million. As of June, $1.2 million of that total had
been raised.
The conference engages thousands of trained volunteers
to maintain trails in 20 counties in New Jersey and New
York. Each year, those volunteers work with public agency
land managers to protect public open space.