To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 8 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • October 9, 2013
Franklin Lakes
Ordinance requires immediate background checks
by Frank J. McMahon
The section of the Franklin Lakes Borough Code enti-
tled “Criminal History Background Checks” is expected to
be amended by the borough council next week. The update
would require all employees and volunteers of youth-serv-
ing recreation programs to have a satisfactory criminal
background check prior to participating in any activity for
which a criminal history background check is required.
Previously, the employees and volunteers had a 30-day
grace period to obtain a satisfactory criminal background
check. In addition, all program directors and coaches must
attend, and become certified through, the Rutgers Uni-
versity Athletic Safety Program. There would be a 30-day
grace period from this requirement for each new program
director and coach.
The borough has had an ordinance pertaining to crimi-
nal background checks since 2007, when an ordinance
required criminal history background checks for any
person with unsupervised direct access to minors involved
in any youth-serving recreation organization as a condition
of using the borough’s facilities.
In 2008, the code was amended to require that all
employees and volunteers of youth-serving recreation orga-
nizations request the State Bureau of Identification in the
Division of State Police, or an authorized vendor, to con-
duct a criminal history record background check on each
prospective and current employee or volunteer of the orga-
nization. At that time, a 30-day grace period was permitted
for employees and volunteers to apply for this background
check. Under the current code, the borough must conduct a
criminal history record background check upon receipt of
the written consent for the check from the prospective or
current person with direct unsupervised access to minors.
The borough must bear the costs associated with conduct-
ing the check.
The Division of State Police or the authorized vendor
then informs the borough’s police department if the per-
son’s criminal history record background check reveals a
conviction of a disqualifying crime or offense. Any infor-
mation received by the police department must be held con-
fidential. Any person who, by virtue of his or her occupation, is
required by statute to undergo a federal and state criminal
history record background check similar in nature to the
requirements contained herein, and who can provide proof
of the results of such background check, is exempt from the
requirement of this code until two years have elapsed since
the most current background check.
Access to criminal history record information for non-
criminal justice purposes, including licensing and employ-
ment, is restricted to the members of the police department
as authorized by the state and any criminal history record
information furnished cannot be disseminated to persons
or organizations not authorized to receive the records for
authorized purposes.
If, however, a person’s background check reveals a
record of conviction of any crime or disorderly persons
offense, that person may be disqualified from serving as an
employee or volunteer of a youth-serving recreation orga-
nization. That employee or volunteer must be provided with
an opportunity to challenge the accuracy of the informa-
tion contained in the criminal history record and a person
is not presumed guilty of any charges or arrests for which
there are no final dispositions.
Safety (continued from page 4)
and be assigned there during his shift. He could do rou-
tine paperwork while being visible and accessible for the
children. Another suggestion related to a heroin education
program at the Jr/Sr High School. Students availing them-
selves of the program would receive a homework pass.
Discussion also included a Senior Citizen call in to
police program, street lights that appear to be low volt-
age and do not provide adequate illumination on Franklin
Avenue, Morrow Road and Dairy Street, and exploring a
safety patrol program.
Peet urged residents to attend future meetings and
voice their concerns. Goals and objectives and procedural
issues will be discussed at the next meeting, she said.