To view this page ensure that Adobe Flash Player version 11.1.0 or greater is installed.
Page 22 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • November 6, 2013
Is voting relevant?
The temptation not to go out and vote is always with
us. One fall, when a school district had a referendum, the
staff members were delighted because a raw, rainy Novem-
ber day conjured up the hope that senior voters would stay
home while parents with school-age children would brave
the weather and approve the bonding so the kids could
enjoy a private-quality education at public expense.
There is, of course, a flip side. People who care enough
about their kids to support a first-rate school system are
generally educated people with money, which can mean a
modicum of intelligence and self-control. The kids are kept
busy enough with homework, sports, and clubs so they have
minimal time to loiter and get into trouble. There actually
is a fringe benefit for older folks to having quality schools
that transcends the fantasy that good teachers and lots of
technology can expand IQs. The schools around here work,
in most cases really well, because of the kind of people
they attract. Barring school violence or drug abuse, most of
these kids would do well in any school, but just any school
would not attract the kind of parents who care.
In most towns, the school budget vote no longer belongs
to the voters. The state now allows districts that move their
school board elections to the date of the general election
in November to skip a budget vote as long as the spend-
ing plan remains within the state-mandated cap, which is
currently two percent. Residents are stuck with last year’s
budget plus two percent unless the school board wants to
take a wild fling and cater to the fantasy that computers can
improve IQs as reliably as a sensible diet, weight lifting,
and running develop strong, healthy bodies.
IQ is intrinsic and there are no vitamins or exercises that
improve it. If parents want to believe IQ can be improved
by great teaching and state-of-the-art computers, some
of them may vote for a 10 percent school tax increase or
approve more bonding and hope for a storm that keeps
older people home, but does not short-circuit the electricity
to the voting machines. The fact that most towns no longer
have a shot at voting on a school budget is one more reason
to roll over and go back to sleep or to go straight to and
from work on Election Day.
Dare we take that option? If people get out of the habit
of voting because the single most important fiscal vote is
no longer under their control, will they get out of the habit
of voting in elections where they might change something
for the better?
They might, but the chances of having a choice are
slim. Most Americans no longer smoke. Most people who do
not smoke want cigarette production curtailed because the
clear evidence that smoking causes cancer and contributes
to heart disease means every smoker is a liability to the
insurance portfolio of the entire community. People who
take care of themselves may ask why they should pay for
health care for people who smoke, drink excessively, eat
red meat at every meal, or neglect any exercise.
Many people desperately want gun control to the point
of abrogating the Second Amendment. Many others want
to be able to buy a handgun in a hardware store by flash-
ing a driver’s license. Neither of these options makes sense.
People who live in isolated areas or engage in high-risk jobs
need firearms for their protection. However, a free flow of
firearms to headstrong youngsters and obvious psychotics
is a genuine menace to public health, though perhaps not
vaguely comparable to drunk driving, habitual speeding,
or cigarette smoking. That issue has also been taken out of
the voters’ hands. The sort of money that manufacturers
pay to the government for the right to manufacture guns,
like the excise taxes paid on cigarettes, renders the gun
manufacturers and the cigarette manufacturers politically
bullet-proof. Do you still support the war in Afghanistan? Did you
support the war in Iraq? I am not talking about showing
respect for the Americans who were brave enough to serve,
or wanting to make sure that those were wounded or psy-
chologically disrupted receive the care they need. I mean
do you believe we should still have troops there? I think
most Americans do not. I think the troops are still there.
This shows the power that public opinion has in the United
States. Even the veterans’ groups disagreed with bombing
Syria. They were right.
If a candidate who promised to pull our forces back to
the countries where they are actually wanted -- and gradu-
ally back to the continental United States -- were to run for
office, he or she would probably carry a majority vote of
those people who are not heavily invested overseas. If the
United States still had a draft, which I never want to see
again, that peaceful candidate would probably capture the
youth vote with ease. A couple of people I knew from col-
lege volunteered, some accepted being drafted, and many
pulled every string they could to get out of serving at all.
However, such a candidate will never get the kind of fund-
ing now needed to carry a national election because the
people with strong commitments to priorities most other
Americans do not share are very often the biggest cam-
paign contributors.
Does anybody fail to understand that the minimum
wage is an absurdity? They should try living on it. Yet one
party is heavily funded by people who think Americans
can live on $7.25 an hour.
We are now producing more college graduates than
we are ever likely to need, and enormous government
subsidies to education beyond high school are producing
a future demographic superabundance of nominally edu-
cated people who will be faced with trying to subsist on the
minimum wage. The other party, or large elements therein,
cannot be budged from the idea that making every Ameri-
can a college graduate will somehow make us a stronger,
happier nation.
Lastly, the ultimate fantasy is that we can somehow vote
our way back to the kind of prosperity we enjoyed from the
1950s through the first decade of the present century. Our
prosperity in those days had a brutally simple explanation:
Two of the world’s great manufacturing powers, Japan and
Germany, had been bombed into rubble; two of the others,
Britain and France, were in an end-cycle as major powers
that began with their catastrophic losses and huge indebt-
edness from World War I and continued through World
War II. The last two players, Russia and China, were stuck
with an economic system where brutal governments and
foolish economic theories discouraged sensible politics and
economics. That slate was wiped clean a decade before the
century ended when the Soviet Union mercifully collapsed
and China verged away from communism.
The United States now has competitors all over the globe
who make most of the stuff we make, but they do it better
or cheaper. We will not vote them out of existence at will.
While some people in these countries focus on conspicu-
ous consumption as Americans did in the 1950s and 1960s,
more of them focus on cultivating a viable lifestyle for their
citizens that does not involve multiple cars per family, daily
consumption of red meat, air conditioning outside hospi-
tals, or college for people who do not belong there. China
is so much bigger than we are that China’s Number Two
status was inevitable.
Japan has about a third of our population with an aging
work force and is still Number Three. Germany, which has
a smaller population than Japan and an aging work force,
is Number Four in export goods. South Korea, incidentally,
now has a higher per capita income and a higher standard
of living than the United States. We will not vote ourselves
back to an exclusive control of the world’s heavy manufac-
turing. Why vote at all? Voting is a good habit to maintain.
At the local level, you can still send the elected officials
a message about your concerns. On the national level, you
can investigate which politicians were responsible for the
shutdown absurdity, and show them what you think -- and
that you are still capable of thinking. I think they need to
know that.
Letters to the Editor
Grateful for community’s support
Dear Editor:
The Friends of the Midland Park Memorial Library
would like to thank the following businesses and individu-
als for supporting the Friends of the Midland Park Memo-
rial Library Open House on Oct. 26: Fred Moadab, The
Wild Bird Emporium; Elizabeth Badaracco, Columbia
Savings Bank; Danny at Dunkin Donuts; Leo at Dunkin
Donuts; Dave Tippner at Team Baker; Steve at Peter’s Fish
Market; Sandra, floral department at King’s Supermarket;
Ben at Pizzaiolo by Brothers; Adam at Westwood Sleep
Centers; Amy at Ethos Fitness Center & Spa; Johanna at
Edible Arrangements; Kathy at Chandel Jewelers; Emmy
at Family Hair Care; Robert at Hudson City Savings Bank;
Sue at the Midland Park Memorial Library; Tim at Whole-
sale Photo; Neil at Marty’s Shoes; Elizabeth at Native by
Nature 2; Carol at the Hotdog Caboose; Judy at Worten-
dyke Studio; Oggi at Rosario’s Trattoria; Mr. Murphy,
principal of Godwin School; Beth Kasbarian at Godwin
School; Sharon, Godwin School Crossing Guard; Marla,
customer at Family Hair Care; Edward at Anything Com-
puters of Midland Park; Ian at Nelund & Minton; Warren at
Midland Park Auto Body; Sarah at V&S Flooring; Andy’s
Community Lunch; Terri at Custom Cut Salon; Kristin
at Custom Cut Salon; Malek at Z’s Barbershop; Nicole at
The Sharp Shop; Adrien at Allstate Insurance; Mari at
Winnie & Belle; Penny at H. Rubin Opticians; Bill at Bill’s
Shoe Repair; Ciro at Tony’s Italian Pizza Kitchen; Jaime
at Atlantic Stewardship Bank; Pauline at Rock Your Hair;
Bob at State Farm Insurance; Ralph at Sal Lauretta for Men;
Fran at Creations by Fran, Flowers & More; Ms. Orrico at
Godwin School; Carol Berninger at Godwin School; Ms.
Carr, Highland School’s librarian; Ms. Bache, principal of
Highland School; Rich, Highland School crossing guard;
and Liz at borough hall.
How wonderful it is to live in a town full of readers will-
ing to share a favorite book and give of their time to pro-
mote our library. Their pictures can be seen in a display at
the library labeled Midland Park Reads!
The Friends would also like to thank graphic designer
Dan Weaver for his time and talent in creating the fall fund
and membership drive door-hangers, and Boy Scout Daniel
Guciardo, who organized 48 man-hours of Midland Park
Troop 157 to distribute the door-hangers.
Thank you Midland Park residents for helping keep the
library at the heart of our community.
Jennifer Triolo, President
Friends of the Midland Park Memorial Library
Midland Park