Page 20 THE VILLADOM TIMES III • January 13, 2010 or Australian and the gorilla.” Marxism demands atheism and extols Darwinism. Dr. King’s witness was Judeo-Christian and Constitutional, and whatever “socialism” he sought to introduce came from the Old Testament Jubilee when slaves were freed and debts forgiven, and the New Testament Acts of the Apostles, the writings of Paul, and the Book of James, where Christians are taught to treat all men and women as brothers and sisters and to help and respect the poor. For all that, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover decided that the Southern Christian Leadership Conference had been infiltrated and was dominated by communists: a belief that was marginally true of the belated Roosevelt administration Hoover himself had once served, but not of Dr. King’s group. Hoover set out to “get” King, by blackmail if possible and by tacit opposition to his work. Enter James Earl Ray, a career criminal from Illinois, pushed out of the U.S. Army for disciplinary offenses. A vagrant, burglar, and armed robber, Ray had also committed mail fraud – the ultimate badge of stupidity among professional criminals because the sentencing is so stiff and the prosecution is federal and effective. Ray appears to have liked prison life most of the time. A prison psychologist said of him, “He apparently lacks foresight, or is afraid of the future, as he absolutely refuses to look forward. He claims that he can do his time better if he doesn’t think. He apparently is enjoying his present situation.” Ray was also an avowed racist who refused to take part in an honors program while in prison because the program was integrated. Facing a lifetime in prison because he was a four-time loser, perhaps uncomfortable as prisons moved toward inmate integration, Ray escaped folded up and hidden inside a breadbox and made his way to Montreal, where he attempted and failed to get Canadian seaman’s papers and leave North America. Here, according to his own story, he met a man with dyed red hair known as Raoul, who asked him to do some lucrative small-time drug smuggling and, in 1968, to buy a high-powered hunting rifle with a telescopic sight. Dr. King had been called to Memphis, Tennessee, to head off violence by hot-headed young blacks during a garbage strike. As usual, he appealed to both sides to remain calm, recognize one another’s humanity, and work constructively for change. As he was coming out of the Lorraine Motel on April 4, 1968, Dr. King was shot in the face with a single rifle bullet that struck his jaw and shattered his spine. A young white man was seen running from a nearby building where the shot had come from and dropped a high-powered rifle with a scope. The rifle had James Earl Ray’s fingerprints on it. Ray, incredibly, eluded arrest for more than two months, fled the country, and was arrested at London’s Heathrow Airport while trying to leave the United Kingdom on a false Canadian passport. He was extradited to Tennessee. Ray confessed to King’s murder on March 10, 1969, recanted three days later, and was offered a guilty plea in return for being spared the death penalty. Nobody thought Ray was a total innocent or a good citizen, but nobody positively identified him as the man they saw fleeing the scene, and a ballistic test on the rifle proved inconclusive. Ray took the guilty plea and got 99 years in prison instead of the chair. Ray escaped from prison again in 1977, and was recaptured three days later. Another year was added to his sentence for an even 100 years. However, Ray then testified before the House Select Committee on Assassinations that he had not shot Dr. King, though he admitted to being part of the conspiracy to kill him – “partially responsible without knowing it.” Dr. King’s son Dexter met Ray in 1997 and, after speaking with him, said he and the King family did not believe Ray was the killer. Many of the younger, somewhat angrier civil rights leaders agreed with Dexter King. They believed that the federal government, Hoover in particular, was somehow complicit. The King family asked for a new trial. They never got one. Ray died of complications of kidney disease and liver failure brought on by hepatitis on April 23, 1998, claiming until he lost consciousness that he was not the triggerman in the murder of Dr. King. People who have studied the case in detail are split over whether Ray was the killer. A man like Ray would have been capable of lying on his deathbed, but since he was neither a Klansman nor a neo-Nazi, he lacked the kind of motivation to have carried out the attack on his own. He may have been a hired gun, or he may have been a “fall guy” dragged in to give the authorities a guilty culprit and lead the investigation away from whoever planned and paid for the murder. We do not know who killed Dr. Martin Luther King, and we do not know who paid to have him killed. His Christian and Constitutional plans to overcome the institutional racism that flourished during his own lifetime and for a half-century before would have been acceptable to all men and women of good will. The plans would have been unacceptable to those on the Far Right who wanted blacks held down so they would provide an endless source of cheap labor, and to those on the Far Left who wanted a violent revolution. For Americans in the middle, the murder of Dr. King was an epic tragedy. For suspects, we have to look to the extremes on either side before we put this case to rest and simply honor his memory. Last year, I was helping a student with a tough college course in writing about other people’s essays. One essay had to do with a big sister cheering up her younger brother after a sex-change operation that she attributed to the fact that their abusive, macho father led a secret life as a transvestite. Another story was three views of a shark: live and scary in an aquarium, dead in a vat of formaldehyde, and stuffed at a museum. These stories were supposed to help readers expand their perspective. They encouraged me to skip lunch. Amid all this exceptionally awful writing, I discovered something that was easily the best thing in the collection: Dr. Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail. The letter was written to explain to conservative African-American clergymen the need to support non-violent civil rights demonstrations for basic rights. Dr. King’s perspective was distinctly Christian. Dr. King said openly that the recent church had become weak in demanding civil rights – the abolitionists of the Civil War era had virtually all been serious Christians – and that white moderates were a disappointment. He also deplored the rhetoric of black extremists who concluded that “the white man is a devil.” He supported the young people who risked beatings and jail to demand rights that were theirs based on simple human decency, and had been constitutionally established since the 1860s – only to be ignored until the 1950s because both parties needed reactionary southern votes to carry national elections, and southerners to serve as soldiers. King’s message was not that white Southerners had to be punished, but that they had to be taught to view black people as entirely human and as brothers in the religious context. That was no easy task given the racist conformity of the era. “Some day the South will know that when these disinherited children of God sat down at lunch counters, they were in reality standing up for what is best in the American dream and for the most sacred values of our Judeo-Christian heritage, thereby bringing our nation back to those great wells of democracy which were dug down deep by the founding fathers in their formulation of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence…Let us all hope that the dark clouds of racial prejudice will soon pass away and the deep fog of misunderstanding will be lifted from our feardrenched communities and in some not too distant tomorrow the radiant stars of love and brotherhood will shine over our great nation with all their scintillating beauty.” Dr. King believed in Christianity and in the Constitution. He most certainly did not believe in Marxism, which embodies slavery for everybody and rejects all religious values. Marx, like Hitler, was an admirer of Darwin, and Darwin was an explicit racist. In “The Descent of Man,” written in 1871 after the United States had finally abolished slavery, Darwin wrote: “At some future period…the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes…will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be the wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro Who killed Dr. Martin Luther King? Don Bosco Salesians (continued from page 11) A recommitment ceremony, wherein the priests rededicated their vocations to the Salesian priesthood, followed during the prayer service in the school’s Mary Help of Christians Chapel. Father Louis J. Molinelli, SDB, director/president of Don Bosco Prep, also gave gifts to the faculty and staff members present in gratitude for their collaboration in carrying out the Salesian mission. After the evening’s celebration, Fr. Molinelli reflected, “Friday night was so beautiful for the Salesians. The dinner and entertainment, the recommitment ceremony and especially the witness of our young people gave all of us Salesians a sense of gratitude to God for our vocation and also gave us an impetus to greater zeal for the mission.” Library expansion (continued from page 7) construction costs will be relatively low. “We believe there will be a lot of bidders, since many people are looking for jobs, so there is an incentive to do it this year,” Boyd added. Current cost estimates place the price tag at approximately $400,000. The library already has over half of that amount in its capital account. A large portion of that funding consists of a $100,000 estate gift from J. David Kamykoski, Boyd’s predecessor who retired in 2001 after 25 years of service to the Waldwick Library. The library also has approximately $118,000, much of which has been gained through the passport program. Boyd explained that, in 2007, travelers to the Caribbean were required to carry a passport, and the library’s convenient passport program was inundated with requests. With $218,000 in hand for the expansion project, Boyd approached the borough council to request $200,000 in capital funds to cover the balance of the cost. She explained that the library plans to reimburse the governing body with the proceeds of its upcoming fundraising efforts. One of the fundraising concepts is a donor board that would be created from tiles purchased by supporters. The tiles would be engraved to honor or memorialize someone, and then placed on a board inside the library. Boyd explained that the same concept was used to raise funds during the major renovations seven years ago, and the library managed to raise $150,000 at that time. She noted that the 2003 effort had been very popular, and drew more potential supporters than there was room for tiles on the original donor board. At this time, the council has not made a decision on the request for the $200,000 appropriation. “It’s clear the library expansion would benefit the community, as we would be able to offer more programs and services to more people,” said Councilman Don Sciolaro. “The difficult decision for the council is: Can we afford to start a project like this when we have other more pressing needs for our resources? While it would be a good thing for the library and the community, I think it’s more a question of when we should undertake a new construction project.”