Page 22 THE VILLADOM TIMES I • May 12, 2010 My wife also gave Peter advice about health food. She does that a lot. I once told him to skip a book about the Salem Witch Trials because I didn’t think he had the knowledge base to follow through on it and he listened to me. He wrote another sports book instead and that also did well. I remember the day he left the City Room like it was last week, though it has to have been 30 years ago. “I’m getting out of here. I won’t be back this time. You’ve actually got some talent. Get out of here before they get you too. These people are like starfish. They suck the talent out of you and spit out what’s left like a clamshell. I’m leaving. You get out while you can.” His advice was good. I split shortly after this good advice from a qualified attorney and best-selling author. The residuals on Indians aren’t like the residuals on baseball, but sanity is important, too. The reason I mention all this is that I want to show that I have no pathological desire to destroy the name or reputation of any reputable author who has sold more books that I have. Golenbock was a good guy and his baseball books were good. I also greatly admire the late Walter Lord, a splendid historian and a gentleman to his fingerprints besides being a friend of the family. I liked and respected my friend the late Rod Thorpe. Mary Higgins Clark, whom I know slightly, is a lovable person and a self-effacing and sizable talent and totally rules in her own niche. The late Dee Brown, whom I also knew slightly, was a grand old gentleman and a fine writer and probably did more for Indian rights than any number of loud-mouthed troublemakers, and certainly did more than I did, though I tried. (He gave my first book a favorable review, and that was a significant honor.) Yet those of us who studiously avoid writing diet books, cook books, sports books, and books about the sex lives of celebrities have long since learned that we should not expect to break into the Top Ten and that any royalties that fend off an eviction notice are about all we can expect. Having said all this, I must aver that I am extremely happy that an increasing portion of the American public has been apprised of the egregious errors of the late Stephen Ambrose. The latest takeout on Ambrose is that he lied about how many hours he spent interviewing Dwight David Eisenhower, who was President of the United States when I was a little kid. Ambrose claimed hundreds of hours of interviews. The Eisenhower diaries and the Eisenhower family indicate Ambrose spent five hours, and never spoke to Eisenhower alone. Go with the diaries. Ambrose claimed Eisenhower came to him for the biography. The family indicates that Ambrose came to them. Ditto. Ambrose also accepted the word of some of the people he interviewed that the inept C-47 pilots chickened out and made life miserable for the paratroopers they dropped in Normandy. The C-47 pilots demanded a retraction and never got one. Life is tougher than you might think under German anti-aircraft fire, and the C-47 pilots deserved equal time. Ambrose, who was a kid when World War II ended and never, so far as I know, wore a uniform or heard a shot fired at him in anger by anybody but the critics - never gave the retraction to the pilots. He also claimed that a British sailor chickened out dropping U.S. soldiers at Normandy and an American officer had to pull a .45 automatic pistol on him to make him land. The British say otherwise. So does the one American survivor in the landing craft. The American G.I. indignantly denied the incident, and said his officer was a hero and not a thug. The aftermath of war is not nice either. Some years ago, a Canadian historian named James Bacque wrote a book called “Other Losses” in which he described the conditions that he reported had killed almost a million German soldiers captured in the last stages of World War II and sequestered on very short rations and without shelter by the Americans as part of “The Morgenthau Plan” to divide Germany into five pastures all the better to hand Stalin Europe’s greatest industrial plant. (Morgenthau’s son pointed out that the actual author of the Morgenthau Plan was Harry Dexter White, confirmed by FBI investigation as a Soviet agent.) Ambrose leaped into the fray and suggested the Americans had simply let the Germans go and forgot to record their departure. The casualties, Ambrose said, were 60,000 and not 600,000. That isn’t what the Germans remember and it isn’t what some of the remorseful American guards remember. Glossing over homegrown traitors and homicidal mistakes to claim we did nothing wrong isn’t real patriotism, and it isn’t honest history. Dwight D. Eisenhower and Douglas MacArthur both thought the atomic bombings were an atrocity and a mistake, and said so. Americans need to get over this endless denial of our own imperfection. We have little to fear if we do so. Japanese-American Relocation wasn’t the Holocaust, and Hitler and Hirohito were far worse than FDR. But while Ambrose’s simplistic good-guy bad-guy version of World War II may play well with some, the rest of the world knows that a German or Japanese child roasted by American or British incendiary bombs was just as dead as an English or Dutch or Polish or Chinese child killed by German or Japanese bombs. The fact that bombs were made in the U.S.A doesn’t make them cute. Maybe I’m envious of Ambrose the way sports fans were envious of Golenbock. But maybe I’d be embarrassed to have my name attached to the sort of history that shrugs off Dresden or Hiroshima or No Gun Ri or My Lai because the murderers were American. Wave the flag all you want – but don’t wrap it around your head so you can’t see women and children screaming and burning just because it’s your own county that kills them. Let’s honor our veterans with what they fought for: the right to speak and write the truth. Male envy is a terrible force to be reckoned with. Guys try to act like they are too macho for anything as feminine as being jealous of another guy’s success, but trust me, men and women are equally bad on the score of hating people who do something we haven’t done and probably can’t do. My own experience with this sort of thing started when my first book, “The Road to Wounded Knee,” hit print and the best-seller list many years ago. People who used to like me, or so I thought, came to hate me. When the book won the Sigma Delta Chi Award for Distinguished Public Service, the assistant managing editor who was hosting the ceremonies at Rutgers treated the whole thing as a joke and a mistake. He had never won anything similar. A guy who was once one of my five best friends looked as if he wanted to push me over a cliff when we all got together at a party a few weeks later. My wife spotted this instantly and whispered, “Don’t stand between Kevin and the cliff…” I got off easy. The guy they really wanted to kill was Peter Golenbock, author of “The Bronx Zoo,” a huge bestseller about the New York Yankees. Writing books about Indians was an easy blow-off – Indians were, at the time my first book came out, the minority nobody cared about. Some people told me – and they were serious – that Indians were extinct. But baseball – ah! – that was a topic most he-men thought they knew about, and they took Golenbock apart line by line, paragraph by paragraph, page by page – out of male envy. John Koster was an eccentric even if his book did win a serious award and stuck to the lower level of the best-seller list for some weeks. But Golenbock wrote the book they all thought they could have and should have written, and it was a huge best-seller. Golenbock was a marked man. I’ve recently experienced the same response recently with “Custer Survivor,” which a lot of people could have written if they had bothered to check the handwriting and the forensics. I’ll try not to stand near any cliffs. Peter and I were friends. I wasn’t in his ballpark in terms of sales, but he and I were both somebodies in a world of nobodies and he was an intelligent man and a good writer. He was also a lawyer. Somebody once handed him the text of an article I had written about a man who was falsely accused of Nazi war crimes and asked him to analyze it legalistically. Peter was Jewish and no friend of war criminals, so I expected the worst. He jumped up, seized me by both arms, and said to my surprise: “This is a masterpiece! They framed this $%##$&$% and you proved it. We should get a Pulitzer out of this!” (We didn’t, but it got an NJPA nomination.) He was, as I said, a lawyer, very intelligent, a young Groucho Marx in terms of his wit and repartee, and head and shoulders above most of the other people in the City Room, and I’d like to think that’s why we were friends – that, and he used to call me at home and tip off my wife when somebody was planning to mess up one of my stories out of sheer envy and make me look like the idiot they all wanted to me to be after the SDX award. The Ambrose Lightship posthumously sinks Letters to the Editor Dear Editor: I am writing to express my support for Rudy Boonstra for Wyckoff Township Committee in the June Republican primary election. I’ve known Rudy for over 10 years and have had the pleasure of serving on the zoning board of adjustment with him as chairman. Over the years, I’ve developed an admiration for Rudy and his commitment to serve our community. Rudy has always extended fair consideration toward township residents. His leadership qualities enable people to realize a common ground and his persistence results in getting the job done. Rudy’s recent experience on the Wyckoff Township Committee provides him with the necessary perspective to understand our community’s current challenges as well as the differing dynamics associated with those challenges. Rudy has already been instrumental in the efforts to preserve Russell Farms as open space, creating new ordinances designed to control the development of Wyckoff and representing the township with the expansion of our library. Completing these and other issues with Rudy’s contribution would be a natural progression and assurance that matters will be resolved correctly. Wyckoff needs a decisive thinker such as Rudy Boonstra who will entertain the concerns of others while navigating a given task toward a successful resolution. I encourage all residents to vote on June 8 in support of proven leadership with Rudy Boonstra. Rich Bonsignore Wyckoff Support for Boonstra Dear Editor: We support the election of Jeff Boucher to Wyckoff Township Committee. Jeff is a long time resident of Wyckoff and has volunteered and served our community through a variety of opportunities, including coaching baseball, softball, and football. He has been a Rotarian for 17 years, a member of the Wyckoff Municipal Alliance, and serves as the chaplain to the Wyckoff Police Department. Jeff possesses a keen awareness of the needs of our community and is incredibly gifted as a leader. He knows how to get things accomplished and he has a great ability to bring people together and move them in the same direction. Jeff is a multi-tasker with boundless energy. His can-do attitude coupled with his gregarious and enthusiastic personality has the ability to draw people in to the vision at hand. We have seen Jeff’s outstanding abilities to locate and marshal resources, both in material and personnel, and use them to accomplish great things. Jeff is a caring, committed and community-oriented individual. He enthusiastically listens to all sides of a debate and uses all available information to make a decision for the long-term welfare and health of his organizations. He will absolutely do the same for the Township of Wyckoff. Please help elect Jeff Boucher to Wyckoff Township Committee. Jim and Pam Abma Wyckoff (continued on next page) Supporting Boucher